More antenna business: The 2m J-pole

I was asked in a comment in the previous post to share the details of the antennas I made, so here we go.

The other antenna in the picture is the J-pole tuned for the 2m amateur band at 144-148MHz. I actually started out building one for the VHF aviation band at 115-135 MHz, based on K4ABT’s J-pole calculator. It worked OK, but not awesome. Then I got started modeling in EZNEC, and when I created this antenna as I had built it, I realized that a J-pole has way too narrow bandwidth to cover the aviation band. The tower at nearby Hilo airport is at 118MHz and since I had centered the antenna in the middle of the band at something like 126MHz, it did not do a very good job at all at 118.

So instead, I decided to repurpose it for the 2m amateur radio band, which is only 4MHz wide. Since going to a higher frequency would make it shorter, I could do that by just cutting the copper pipe and soldering new endcaps on it.

When I rescaled it to 146MHz in EZNEC, I of course had to keep the separation between the two sections the same as it was built, so the separation was about 0.5″ larger than indicated by that calculator. Most calculators also say that the length of the bottom section is irrelevant, but in EZNEC it did make a difference, so I added it at the existing length of 11″. The trick was now to tweak the lengths of the poles and the feed point location to get the antenna tuned to the 2m band.

Modeling the feed point in EZNEC is a bit tricky, by the way. Since the source is located near the bottom of the “J”, it makes a small current loop. This is explicitly mentioned as something to be careful with in the EZNEC documentation, so I played with the segment lengths to make sure the results were stable. An additional problem is that the NEC calculating engine can’t handle changing wire diameters, so I had to model the coax feed as a 1/2″ diameter conductor when in reality it’s more like 1mm. This probably introduces some error in the calculation, so ideally the feed point should be tweaked experimentally using an SWR meter, if I had one.

While I could get a good impedance match by moving the feed point, the radiation pattern was not ideal. The pattern was fairly strongly tilted upwards. However, I discovered that tweaking the relative lengths of the long and short sections would move the pattern up and down, as shown in the plot below.

The radiation pattern of the J-pole. The original down-scaled antenna is shown in green as "Jpole146". When I changed it to make the long section longer and the short section shorter (while keeping the minimum SWR at 146MHz) the pattern tilted upward as shown in blue. In contrast, when I shortened the long section and extended the short section, I arrived at the final result shown in black. While there is still a net tilt to the pattern, the maxima in both directions are now on the horizon.

The radiation pattern of the J-pole. The original down-scaled antenna is shown in green as “Jpole146”. When I changed it to make the long section longer and the short section shorter (while keeping the minimum SWR at 146MHz) the pattern tilted upward as shown in blue. In contrast, when I shortened the long section and extended the short section, I arrived at the final result shown in black. While there is still a net tilt to the pattern, the maxima in both directions are now on the horizon.

So, by making the short section slightly longer and the long section shorter (where the exact ratio of the changes was determined by keeping the minimum SWR point in the center of the 2m band at 146MHz), and then tuning the feed point location again, I arrived at a design that has the maximum gain in the horizontal direction and is in resonance with a perfect impedance match at 146MHz, as shown below.

The SWR of the tuned J-pole. At 146MHz, the impedance is a practically perfect match to 50ohm cable, and across the entire band, the SWR is less than 1.4.

The SWR of the tuned J-pole. At 146MHz, the impedance is a practically perfect match to 50ohm cable, and across the entire band, the SWR is less than 1.4.

So, for those of you who want to go out and solder one up, here are the measurements: The long section (dimension A in the calculator) is 1450mm, the short section (dimension B) 519mm, the separation (dimension D) 59mm, the bottom section 280mm, and the feed point located 59mm away from the bottom. Note that unlike what’s mentioned on that site, these measurements are relative to the center of the conductors.

Again, I don’t have an SWR meter or a spectrum analyzer, so I can’t actually verify these numbers, but I can say that the Big Island Amateur Radio Club‘s repeater up in Kulani comes in crystal clear. Not that I’ve talked to anyone yet, but at least now I have an antenna that I can do it with, once I route the coax down from the attic.

More antenna business: The 1090MHz Franklin

I was asked in a comment in the previous post to share the details of the antennas I made, so here we go.

The Franklin antenna was made as described here, made out of #6 gauge copper wire (which is 4.1mm diameter). However, bending 4mm copper wire in sharp angles isn’t so easy if you don’t have special equipment, so it was hard to get the bends to be in the exact right places. For this reason, my measurements are a bit off from that site (the real antenna isn’t even exactly symmetric, but I didn’t include that in the EZNEC model).

The antenna I made has radiator lengths of about 137mm (instead of 133mm) and the folded sections are 66mm long with the wires spaced 6mm apart. The length of the folded center section and the separation between the two wires there is important for impedance matching of the antenna, so I then proceeded to tweak this in EZNEC to get the lowest SWR against the 75ohm cable. This ended up being 70mm long, with the wires 10mm apart and the coaxial feed located 10mm from the end.

The antenna in the link is also shorted in the center. Mine was like that originally, but with the preamp in the coax there is a 12V DC bias between the coax center and shield, so it can’t be shorted. One could decouple the DC with a small capacitor, but when I removed the short, the impedance matching improved, so I didn’t bother.

The plots below show the results of the simulation:

The SWR of the Franklin antenna as described. At 1090MHz, the SWR is 1.06, pretty much as good as it gets.

The SWR of the Franklin antenna as described. At 1090MHz, the SWR is 1.06, pretty much as good as it gets.

The gain vs elevation plot, with a maximum of 6.7dB. The maximum is in the direction opposite  from where the folded sections point, but the front/back difference is only 1.1dB.

The gain vs elevation plot, with a maximum of 6.7dB. The maximum is in the direction opposite from where the folded sections point, but the front/back difference is only 1.1dB.

I don’t have any equipment to measure the SWR, but that this setup worked well is roughly confirmed by anecdotal evidence from the maximum range I could detect airplanes at (there isn’t enough traffic to get a very good idea, and most planes are concentrated into 3 routes so apart from those 3 I don’t get much data).

However, I wouldn’t overthink the antenna for detecting ADS-B broadcasts. Like I said in the previous post, I got 80% of this range with just a quarter-wave dipole of two short wires attached to the end on the coax. Getting the antenna in a spot that has free line of sight is the most important thing.

Some antenna business

Over the last couple of weeks I’ve played a bit with “software-defined radio”. By happenstance, I came across the website Flightradar24 which is a Swedish startup company that is building a global flight tracking network. Airplanes have transponders that reply to radar interrogation, and in the latest implementation called “ADS-B”, they are doing away with the radar entirely. Instead, aircraft transponders send their GPS position directly, so if you have a suitable receiver, you can track nearby airplanes. FR24 is leveraging this by having people host receivers for them, and in return they get a free subscription to their service.

The really cool thing is that over the past year or so, people figured out that tiny $20 USB dongles meant for receiving digital TV can actually be used as programmable receivers across an extremely wide frequency range, something like 25-1800MHz. In particular, they can be used to receive these aircraft transmissions at a frequency of 1090MHz.

This sounded too much fun to pass up, so I ordered a dongle, some coaxial cable, and made a simple dipole antenna with two wires. Amazingly, with this bare-minimum setup could track planes coming in from the mainland over 400km away! To make a more permanent installation, however, I needed to get an antenna up on the roof with free line of sight.

It’s not obvious how to mount things on our metal roof, and with the amount of rain we get here, you really don’t want to penetrate the roof. However, we have a couple of vent pipes from the sewage pipes poking up, so I figured I could attach something to them. However, they aren’t really meant to hold things, so I wanted the installation to be as light as possible.

I thought about attaching a 1″ PVC pipe and mounting the antenna to it, but PVC pipe is actually really heavy. Since I have plenty of epoxy and fiberglass lying around, I decided to make a short mast myself.

This is the short mast that I made. It's made up of fiberglass around a foam pipe insulation core. The bottom bracket is for strapping it against the vent pipe.

This is the short mast that I made. It’s made up of fiberglass around a foam pipe insulation core. The bottom bracket is for strapping it against the vent pipe.

The whole thing weighs barely a pound or two, much lighter and stiffer than the same length PVC pipe. While I was putting stuff up, I also wanted to make an antenna for the 2m amateur radio band. I’m a very inactive radio amateur, but putting up an antenna would at least make it possible to use the little handheld Yaesu FT51 radio I’ve owned for almost 20 years.

So, what kind of antenna to make? For the 1090MHz reception, I decided to make a 4-element Franklin antenna. This is a vertically stacked dipole with 4 elements, which amplifies signals near the horizon. This is the kind of pattern you want, since far away airplanes by definition are close to the horizon.

For the 2m band, antennas are getting big, so they have to be sturdy. I made a J-pole antenna out of 1/2″ copper water pipe.

There are descriptions for making these antennas for various bands online, but rather than rely on them, I ran some simulations myself using the EZNEC antenna simulator. Especially at 1090MHz, where the wavelength is about a 0.3m, small differences matter. While in principle the radiating sections should be a quarter wavelength long, a real antenna with conductors of finite thickness and with several wires coupling to each other will need to be tweaked slightly for optimal efficiency and impedance matching.

Here’s the final result mounted on the roof:

Here's the 144MHz J-pole and 1090MHz Franklin mounted on the home-made fiberglass mast.

Here’s the 144MHz J-pole and 1090MHz Franklin mounted on the home-made fiberglass mast.

One additional complication was that the long coaxial cable needed to get the signal down from the roof to the receiver completely obliterated the signal. Even with expensive, low-loss coax, at 1GHz frequencies losses are substantial. Instead, people have successfully used in-line cable TV amplifiers mounted by the antenna and powered through the coax. These amplifiers are like $5 on ebay, so I got one of those and it works great. You can see it mounted on the horizontal bar in the picture above. The coax could conveniently be routed into the attic through the spaces at the roof ridge cover.

I still need to route the coax down from the attic to our server in the basement, but so far the reception has improved a bit compared to having the antenna in the window. I’m now picking up planes over 500km away. This is basically the radio horizon distance for planes at 30-40,000 ft, and since UHF propagation is pretty much line of sight, that’s about as good as it gets. Not bad for maybe $50 total invested!

Drainage improvements #2 – a whole lotta’ digging

In the last post, I wondered whether rerouting the downspout drainage away from the house would be enough to avoid more flooding… Well, I decided that it was better not to take any chances, so I started digging. I’d already dug a little hole to check for drainage pipes, so it was just a matter of continuing. Lifting rocks isn’t exactly my strong point, so I’ve been doing it in small increments (all the while hearing the song “16 tons” in my head) but I’ve made it basically along the entire front of the house.

It’s been pretty dry for the past month or so, but the other day we finally got a good Hilo-style rain of something like 5″ of rain over 12 hours. That at least answered the question of whether doing all this digging was necessary, because when I checked it out in the morning, it looked like this:

Water pooling in the trench next to the house

Water pooling in the trench next to the house

After admiring all that rock I’ve hauled out of the ground, you probably notice that the bottom of the trench is filled with water! When I first discovered it, the water was more than a foot deep. Nothing had yet made it into the basement, but I wasn’t about to wait and see. After a quick trip to Home Depot to get a pump, I started pumping the water out.

The pump, which is supposed to pump 1500 gallons/hour, barely kept up with the incoming water when the rain was heavy.

The pump, which is supposed to pump 1500 gallons/hour, barely kept up with the incoming water when the rain was heavy.

First, the pump barely kept up with the incoming water, then the rain got heavier and it lost ground. The water level rose so it submerged the entire pump for a while, then it largely stopped raining and it made some progress. It took until late afternoon until all the water was gone. As the water level dropped, I could actually see water flowing out through the rocks under the house and into the pool!

I think what’s happening is that the whole yard is basically made up of a fill of these large lava rocks, lying on top of solid lava at some point. The rock fill is very porous, so the water will flow down the slope on top of the solid lava until it hits the house, where the concrete footing basically makes a dam which the water fills up.

As you can see in the pictures above, the water filling the trench is absolutely clear. It’s clearly not flowing through dirt. Whatever material it’s going through on the way has probably been washed clean over the years, which is good because it seems the risk of getting the drains clogged with silt will be minimal.

The drainage situation probably isn’t improved by the fact that the street facing the yard has no gutters. When it rains heavily, water comes streaming down the street, running off the side facing our yard. The neighbors’ yard is also higher than ours on the street side, so water probably also flows down that way. Maybe adding a surface drainage along the street would help? But first we gotta get the drainage around the house down. I’m almost down to a good level along the top side of the house, but there are some very large rocks that still need to be removed or cracked off so the drainage pipe can maintain a good slope. Then we need to get the pipe down along the side, too…

Drainage improvements

As I noted in the basement unfinishing story, the basement has moisture problems. I was curious to find out if there was any sort of drainage around the perimeter of the house, so I started digging down along the foundation. This turned out to be rather difficult. While it looks like the house is surrounded by gravel, I found that this is only the surface. The gravel quickly give way for lava rocks. This made it quite a pain in the ass to dig, but after some amount of digging and lifting foot-sized rocks, I made it down to the foundation footer. No drainage.

Now, how one can build an underground foundation in the rainiest town in the U.S without putting in a drainage system is beyond me. Maybe they didn’t know about drainage in the fifties? The house I grew up in has several French drains going around the perimeter of the house, and even today, almost 40 years after the house was built, there’s a constant trickle of water draining out of this system. I guess I figured this was something you normally did when building a house, but apparently not.

Anyway. One thing everyone says you should check if you have basement moisture problems is that the downspouts from the roof don’t discharge water near the perimeter of the house. There is a downspout coming down right at the corner where that basement room is, and while there was a pipe taking the water all the way to the property line, I wasn’t convinced this actually worked well. This is what the area looks like:

The downspout used to route in between the two walls over to the lava wall by the property line.

The downspout used to route in between the two walls over to the lava wall by the property line.

I didn’t take any pictures of the pre-existing setup, but the downspout went in between the two concrete/stone walls, past the red flowers, and terminated by the lava wall on the property line in the upper left. While this led the water as far away from the house as possible in that direction, the water didn’t really have anywhere to go. It was discharged between those two walls and, if anything, that area slopes back towards the house. During heavy rainfall, I’d noticed that the entire area in between those walls turned into a pool of standing water.

This picture kind of shows how the ground actually slopes back towards the house in this  area. Not exactly how it's supposed to be.

This picture kind of shows how the ground actually slopes back towards the house in this area. Not exactly how it’s supposed to be.

It’s hard to see in the picture above, but the lawn is quite a bit sloped towards the house here. As a consequence, the water pooling up between those two walls probably took the path of least resistance, which I suspect is towards the gravel bed around the perimeter. The lawn in the corner nearest the house, in the center of the picture above, looked like it got too wet, and the inside walls of the basement room look like the most moisture is about where that water would end up.

So I decided to improve the drainage. First I was going to keep the existing pipe and just extend it down the property line (to the right in the first picture). I got so far as to hack away the stone in the wall so the pipe could go through when I realized that to get proper slope on the drain I’d have to dig a trench right through the bushes next to the property line. This seemed like a lot of work.

Instead, I decided to just test how much difference it would make by re-routing the pipe down the side of the house all the way down to the lowest corner of the yard.

The new routing takes the drain all the way down the side of the house, across the lawn, and out to the property line.

The new routing takes the drain all the way down the side of the house, across the lawn, and out to the property line.

This is sort of suboptimal in that it takes the pipe across the lawn. Not that we do anything on the lawn anyway, but for a more permanent installation we’d probably want to route it underground. This way we can at least see if it makes a difference to the amount of moisture in the basement. We’ll see in a week or two if anything’s changed, I guess.

While I was working with all that PVC pipe, I also discovered that it fits almost perfectly on the outside of the broken metal downspout on the lanai. The top part of the pipe that goes out and connects to the gutter has been missing since we moved in. When it rains, the water instead falls the 16 feet or so down on the rocks below, splashing water everywhere and making quite the noise. We’d tried to find a replacement pipe, but none of the home improvement carry metal pipe any longer. These days it’s all plastic. However, the PVC pipe just about slid on the outside of it.

This part of the metal downspout was missing, sending the water falling 14 feet down on the rocks below. The PVC drain pipe fit around it.

This part of the metal downspout was missing, sending the water falling 14 feet down on the rocks below. The PVC drain pipe fit around it.

There are two small problems with this arrangement. The obvious one is that the pipe fits around the outside of the downspout, and you really want it on the inside. A generous helping of gutter sealant when sliding it on seems to have sealed it up, though. The second problem is that normally you attach the downspout to the gutter. Here, that would require either a 14-foot ladder or hanging down from the roof above. None of those options seemed really appealing, so instead I just hung it from the beam above with some steel wire. A bit ghetto, but it works. If it ever breaks, we’ll revert to the original plan which was to just replace the entire downspout with a plastic one. But that will still require fastening it to the gutter…

Basement “un-finishing” #3 – top coat

Finally, we got to the final step in our basement floor recoating project: actually applying the top coat. We used EpoxyShield garage floor coating, a two-component epoxy that hopefully will be pretty durable. As usual when it comes to painting, the actual painting takes a small fraction of the time compared to the sanding, patching, and cleaning.

Unfortunately we had a fair amount of rain over the last week (in Hilo, “a fair amount” is something like 10 inches or 250mm) and there is clear moisture in the west room where the carpet had been. It looks like we’re going to need to put in some sort of drainage around the perimeter of the building after all. (I can’t believe that in a place where it rains 200″ per year, you’d build a basement and not put in a French drain around the slab. Of course, this would have been easily avoided by not having a basement at all, per customary “post-and-pier” construction.

In any case, we did the rest of the basement, which is dry, so we can put that back in use. Using one gallon of the EpoxyShield turned out to be a perfect amount, it took us a few feet into the west room. And it looks pretty good.

This is what the applied EpoxyShield looks like, with the "decorative paint chips".

This is what the applied EpoxyShield looks like, with the “decorative paint chips”.

Looking into the hallway towards the back.

Looking into the hallway towards the back.

You can still see the areas that I patched, because the top coat doesn’t soak into it like it does on the bare concrete. I don’t know whether it will still be visible after it’s cured.

The paint chips actually look pretty good. Kathy was very skeptical about the concept, but she came around once we started throwing them on. I hope the coat is thick enough that it sticks properly. I definitely saw some chips kind of lying on edge.

So hopefully that’s the end of the story for the back end of the basement. And I guess the next step for the front is to dig a trench around the front of the house and put down some perforated pipe.

Basement “un-finishing” #2

After the grinding of the concrete in the basement, it was time to fill. I got some “EpoxyShield concrete patch”, which is basically a very thick epoxy, and started patching holes. First I just filled holes where stones or whatever had come out. (This is an endless task with diminishing returns… I wonder what the distribution of hole sizes are. It certainly goes up steeply towards smaller sizes.)

I was also using the vibrating multitool to get the remains of the carpet adhesive off from the corners and edges where the grinder couldn’t reach. In the process, I looked up close at a patch of dark concrete under the window (visible in the last picture of post #1) and decided the surface didn’t look good. The multitool did a surprisingly effective job demolishing it, the concrete looked kind of like dirt as it came apart. That certainly seemed like it would be a candidate for cracking and chipping after the top coat has come on, so I decided to fill it with patching compound.

This is the largest area of bad concrete that I filled. It was either soft and crumbling or had a very rocky and uneven surface. See the putty knives for scale.

This is the largest area of bad concrete that I filled. It was either soft and crumbling or had a very rocky and uneven surface. See the putty knives for scale.

There were more chunks of bad concrete where it either came apart like the first one, or it was already eroded so the rocks were the highest part of the surface, kind of like dimples. That also didn’t seem too good to coat over, so I ended up needing another set of patching compound before the filling was done

Luckily the concrete in the rest of the basement is in better shape. There were a few areas of the “knobbly” surface, but nothing soft and deteriorating like under the window. However, the area around the floor drain was very uneven, so I figured it wouldn’t hurt to improve it so there would be less chance of getting little puddles of water sitting around without draining.

The

The area around the floor drain under the utility sink was also extremely uneven, like someone chipped out the slope down towards the drain with a huge chisel. I decided to "improve" it with the remaining patching compound.

The area around the floor drain under the utility sink was also extremely uneven, like someone chipped out the slope down towards the drain with a huge chisel. I decided to “improve” it with the remaining patching compound.

Once the patches had cured, I sanded them down to be more even. Most of the sanding was done with either the DA air sander or with a random orbital sander. Sanding down into the concrete does a quick number on the pads, so I went through a number. For the more severe cases, like the floor drain, I used the multitool.

This is after a quick job of evening out the compound. Notice that I've gone through to rock in many places, which makes it very difficult to do a better job. It's still way better than it was before.

This is after a quick job of evening out the compound. Notice that I’ve gone through to rock in many places, which makes it very difficult to do a better job. It’s still way better than it was before.

After patching, it was time to clean. There was concrete dust everywhere, which of course needs to be cleaned off if the top coat is to adhere well. The instructions say to wet down the floor and then scrub with TSP. Then all the water and dirt has to be removed so it doesn’t just soak in again, and then rinsed numerous times. The trick here was to use the shop vac with a wet pickup nozzle. This is kind of like a squeegee mounted on a narrow, wide vacuum nozzle, and does a quick job getting the water off the floor. It would have been even quicker if I’d had a bigger shop vac, as it was it quickly got full with water and needed emptying. And it clearly was doing something, because the amount of silt and grit in the water was crazy. (The water showed no tendency to get cleaner with repeated rinses, so this is probably also one of these futile jobs you just have to call good at some point.)

Now the floor looks like this:

Here's the floor after scrubbing with water, TSP, and rinsing numerous times.

Here’s the floor after scrubbing with water, TSP, and rinsing numerous times.

Note how much less evenly gray the floor is compared to the first picture. That’s because all that gray is remaining dust, even after vacuuming several times.

The next step now is to let the floor dry thoroughly, and then we just might be ready for the top coat. It would really be nice to be able to use this room again!

Basement “un-finishing” #1

The basement was advertised as “partially finished”. We weren’t sure what to think of that, it has the scary shower, affectionately know by us as the “torture room” since it would make a great addition to some serial killer drama. The three rooms were also “finished” in the sense that they had carpet floors, while the rest of the basement has concrete, and some kind of inner wall made of thin white paneling.

Obviously, we weren’t too fond of the carpets, but we became even less fond of them at some point last December when we got 12″ of rain in 24h (for reference, that’s about the average annual rainfall in LA…) and discovered that the basement was taking in water! Not much water, but you don’t need a lot to soak a carpet. After a mad dash to quickly move all our boxes out of the room and mop up most of the water, we’d had it with the carpet. (It was obvious from the moisture marks on the paneling that this wasn’t the first time, either. What on Earth were they thinking!)

The good news was the carpet came up pretty easily (probably because the glue and foam had disintegrated from moisture.) However, because the carpet went under the paneling, we had to rip out the paneling too. No great loss. And finally the studs they had put up to mount the paneling. We were now left with an “un-finished” room:

This is what the basement room looked like after ripping up the carpet and taking down the inner wall and studs.

This is what the basement room looked like after ripping up the carpet and taking down the inner wall and studs.

Of course, now we were left with concrete covered with remnants of foam and old carpet glue. Since they had dutifully glued down the carpet over the nice wooden steps leading into the room, I brought out the remains of my favorite methylene chloride paint stripper to get it off.

To get the carpet glue off the steps down into the room, we brought my favorite methylene chloride stripper out of retirement.

To get the carpet glue off the steps down into the room, we brought my favorite methylene chloride stripper out of retirement.

The concrete also had these areas where it was turning into flaky dust, like this:

Some parts of the concrete was flaking up like this. The guy at the tool rental said this wasn't concrete but something they used to level the floor a long time ago.

Some parts of the concrete was flaking up like this. The guy at the tool rental said this wasn’t concrete but something they used to level the floor a long time ago.

Clearly if we were to have any chance of coating the concrete with something, this needed to be cleaned up. The guy at Puna Rentals that I talked to about getting some machine to grind down the concrete with said this probably wasn’t really concrete but rather something they used to use to level the floor in the old days. It should come off without much problem.

Puna Rentals only had a gas-powered concrete grinder, which was not an optimal solution to run in a basement room, but Home Depot had diamond “concrete coating remover” blades for a floor buffer that could be used to clean off concrete. The blade was $60 per day, in addition to the machine, so there’s gotta be a fair amount of diamond in there…

The machine was pretty effective, but it made a lot of dust!

Here I am grinding away at the concrete. The concrete turned into this extremely fine dust that basically got optically thick so I could no longer see what I was doing.

Here I am grinding away at the concrete. The concrete turned into this extremely fine dust that basically got optically thick so I could no longer see what I was doing.

In the beginning I had the doors closed to the room to prevent getting dust into the rest of the basement, and I could only use the machine for a few minutes before the dust was so thick I could literally not see what the machine was doing! After a while, the trade winds picked up and I opened the doors to get some airflow. This blew most of the dust out the window and kept visibility reasonable. There was enough dust blowing out that it turned the lava rocks outside white.

The dust cloud coming out the window. The window is actually a bug screen, but it's so full of dust that it's essentially opaque.

The dust cloud coming out the window. The window is actually a bug screen, but it’s so full of dust that it’s essentially opaque.

The "coating remover" blade was really quite effective. Here I've run it in the far corner, and as you can see, most traces of the carpet glue and stuff are totally gone.

The “coating remover” blade was really quite effective. Here I’ve run it in the far corner, and as you can see, most traces of the carpet glue and stuff are totally gone.

It didn’t take long to get the remains of carpet glue and foam off, but the white flaky parts took some work. I also wanted to make sure the coating would have a fresh concrete surface to adhere to, so I kept grinding away. It removed a surprising amount, as evidenced by the fact that we ended up with upwards of 100lb of concrete dust in the trash can.

Most of the surface imperfections are now gone.

Most of the surface imperfections are now gone.

The end result looks like this. We now have a fairly even surface of healthy concrete, so there shouldn’t be a problem getting the coating to stick.

The final product, a pretty evenly ground down surface.

The final product, a pretty evenly ground down surface.

One possible issue might be moisture. I did a couple of moisture tests by putting a piece of plastic tarp down on the floor and seeing if we got any moisture, and I didn’t. However, the darker spot in the upper right sure seems like moisture. I’ll try again to make sure.

Since we had the machine for 24h, we decided to continue and work over the concrete in part of the rest of the basement. About half is in pretty good shape, with a non-slip coating on it, but the other half not so much. Unfortunately this meant that we had to clear out all stuff, and then we ended up with dust everywhere anyway. Just cleaning up all the dust practically took longer than grinding the floor did.

Next steps are to patch the holes in the concrete and get ready to apply the coating.

Kitchen cabinets

One of the remaining (massive) projects is to refinish the kitchen. It has built-in, what must be hand-made, cabinets, which really needed a makeover. However, after moving in, we realized that the kitchen (actually most of the old parts of the house) have lead paint. The top layer is lead-free, but the primer has lead. This includes the paint used on the kitchen shelves and cabinets. Not so awesome.

The advice regarding lead paint mostly seems to be “if you don’t have to touch it, don’t”. That might work on the walls in the rest of the house, but the paint in the kitchen is not in such good shape, and bumping into the shelves results in little chips of lead paint. So rather than paint it over and then worry every time we have paint damage for the rest of our lives, we decided it was better to get rid of it once and for all and then not have to worry again.

This is an example of the kind of shape the kitchen cabinets are in.

This is an example of the kind of shape the kitchen cabinets are in.

A closeup of the questionable condition of the paint on the cabinets.

A closeup of the questionable condition of the paint on the cabinets.

Now, the first order of business is to safely strip the paint without contaminating the entire property with lead. This is worthy of a post itself, so here I’m just going to say it’s a bitch. Once the cabinets are stripped, they look like this:

Here's a cabinet after stripping. I'm not sure what the wood is, but it has quite a noticeable grain pattern.

Here’s a cabinet after stripping. I’m not sure what the wood is, but it has quite a noticeable grain pattern.

Kathy took charge of the color selection, and we looked at different paints. Since we’re going through such a pain prepping the cabinets, it doesn’t make sense to use anything less than the best paint available. We’re going with Fine Paints of Europe, which imports Dutch paints to the US. (They also have a bunch of movies on their web page talking about how cheap and poor quality most American paint is, which of course appealed to my Europe-is-superior sensibilities… 😉

The walls of the kitchen will be green, and the trim an off-white. The center panels of the cabinet doors will also be green. The trim paint is ECO Brilliant, an oil paint that has a very shiny and durable surface. The wall paint is Eurolux Matte, a water-based, matte paint that still is easy to clean, with their Oil Primer/Undercoat as primer. To get an idea of what it would look like, I went ahead and painted up a test specimen.

I went ahead and painted one door all the way through to see what it would look like and make sure we liked the color.

I went ahead and painted one door all the way through to see what it would look like and make sure we liked the color.

The test door put into its place. The new white has a slightly warmer tone than the old one. This was intentional, because it makes the yellowing with age that happens to oil paints less noticeable.

The test door put into its place. The new white has a slightly warmer tone than the old one. This was intentional, because it makes the yellowing with age that happens to oil paints less noticeable.

We liked the color. However, the surface quality leaves much to be desired. There are dings and scratch marks from the scraper used to get the paint off, and the grain pattern of the wood comes through very prominently. Given the amount of work that’s going into this, such an outcome was not satisfactory.

This closeup shows how visible the scrape marks and surface imperfections are in the new paint.

This closeup shows how visible the scrape marks and surface imperfections are in the new paint.

So, the surface has to be “fixed”. In principle, we could sand the cabinets, but there are still lead remnants in the wood, so sanding would send clouds of lead-contaminated dust. A better solution is to build up the surface with someting that can then be sanded down. (The same principle as using a skim coat or high-build primer when painting the motorcycles.) While spackling paste can be used to fill in the deep gouges, it’s not very good as a skim coat. Fine Paints comes to the rescue again with a product called Brushing Putty. This is essentially an oil-based very-high-build primer that is painted on with a brush and then sanded down to a smooth surface.

Brushing putty comes to the rescue.

Brushing putty comes to the rescue.

After painting the cabinets with it, they look like this:

After being painted with Brushing Putty, the cabinets look like this.

After being painted with Brushing Putty, the cabinets look like this.

Then the sanding begins. The product is pretty impressive, as it sands down to a glass-smooth surface. However, it takes a fair amount of work, and while the big flat areas can be done with a palm sander, in the corners you have to do it by hand. It’s going to take a lot of work, but I think the end product will be awesome. I’m currently working on sanding a batch of cabinets, and when that’s done I’ll paint another test subject. Stay tuned.

A shelf with sanded Brushing Putty. Note how the grain pattern of the wood has been filled in. It's hard to appreciate the quality of the surface in this picture.

A shelf with sanded Brushing Putty. Note how the grain pattern of the wood has been filled in. It’s hard to appreciate the quality of the surface in this picture. To get the best surface, you should not sand down to bare wood. However, these shelves are in such bad shape and aren’t really visible anyway so I’m not going all-out here.

Garage door

It’s very common for garages in Hawaii to not have doors (in case you wonder, that does not make them carports. Carports have to be open on at least two sides, or something like that), and ours didn’t.

Here's the garage as it looked when we moved in. There was no door, only this big "arch-shaped" doorway.

Here’s the garage as it looked when we moved in. There was no door, only this big “arch-shaped” doorway.

The problem with having no garage door is that most people also don’t have motorcycles, and given that theft is a problem in Hawaii, I didn’t really want to have the bikes outside. (This was even confirmed by the movers. When they rolled the bikes out of the Matson container, they told me to not leave them in the garage as they would get stolen.) So, one of the first things we did upon arriving was to call a couple of garage door companies. We liked Kobay Garage Doors, so we went with them.

Things got a bit complicated because, as you can see in the picture above, the garage has these diagonal beams supporting the roof. This means there’s not a lot of vertical space for a door, so they had to use a special door that can turn a tight radius or the door would have to be very low or very narrow. That, on top of the fact that we wanted a flush door instead of the common “carriage house” model with a matrix of squares, meant that there was something like 6 weeks delivery time. Oh well, can’t be helped.

But before the door could be mounted, they had to build a frame for it. When Kobay showed up to do this, they discovered our leftover planks from the kitchen doorway, so they used those instead of plywood. This way it matched the existing garage a bit better (though not really that well).

This is after adding the frame for the garage door.

This is after adding the frame for the garage door.

The framing used very rough lumber, and the planks from the kitchen were white. To protect the framing from the elements they had to be painted, but luckily I had 6 weeks to do that… The first order of business was to wait a couple weeks for the wood to dry — it was soaking wet when they added it. I guess this happens often in Hilo.

Anyway, after a bunch of sanding, spackling, and painting, the frame was ready for the door. I concentrated on the inside first, since access to those parts would be blocked when the door was mounted.

Here's the painted frame. The yellow paint used on the inside was mis-matched by HPM, so it's totally the wrong color.

Here’s the painted frame. The yellow paint used on the inside was mis-matched by HPM, so it’s totally the wrong color.

HPM had matched a pint of yellow paint that I used to patch some parts on the house that were flaking. They also recognized the brown used on the framing as “Tudor Brown”, so I also had some of that. However, for the garage I was going to need more than a pint, so I went back and got a gallon. However, when I started painting the inside, I noticed it was a distinctly different color from the pint… It didn’t matter much for the inside, so I finished that up, but then I went back to HPM. Turns out whoever mixed the gallon had used the wrong base. They happily took the useless gallon back and mixed up a correct gallon for me.

Finally, the door showed up and in a few hours, Kobay had it mounted. Now all that remained was the outside paint. The entire garage is a different yellow than the rest of the house, a much more sharp yellow. Because of this, I repainted the entire front. After some TSP washing, light sanding, and scraping of failing patches, two coats of yellow and brown trim, it was finally done. It looks pretty good, and the brown actually matches the brown color of the door itself pretty well.

Here's the repainted front of the garage, now with a yellow shade that matches the house and with the "Tudor Brown" trim.

Here’s the repainted front of the garage, now with a yellow shade that matches the house and with the “Tudor Brown” trim.

The only problem, and I should have thought about this, is that the dark brown garage door gets super hot in the afternoon when the Sun hits it. You literally feel the heat radiating from it inside the garage. Maybe at some point we’ll repaint it yellow instead.

So can I now take the bikes out from the basement and park them in the garage? Not quite — the entrance at the back of the garage doesn’t have a door, so it’s still no more secure than before… Besides, the garage is being used as painting/sanding station, so the bikes are probably better off in the basement for a while longer.